I'm all for practising science. Science is based on presuppositions consistent with a Christian worldview- the world is rationally intelligible, there is intent to behind it to be understood, immaterial laws of logic and maths exist. I see this as totally inconsistent with a worldview where we are dancing to unguided chemical reactions and the physical world is all there is.

What we are discussing here is a question of what happened in history- in my resurrection article I argued to key historical facts based off historical criteria such as dissimilarity, embarrassment, mutiple attestation etc. This is how you assess a historical event not through a peer reviewed repeated experiment.

Moreover, if the material world is all there is on what basis can you have an immaterial principle that logic and evidence should be used? You can't. Hence the importance of understanding worldview consistency as per point 3. Thanks for having a read and engaging with my article. All the best!